- TakenDecember 2011
- Photographer:
- Shai Halevi
- Image Type:
- Infrared Image
- Side:
- Recto
- TakenDecember 2011
- Photographer:
- Shai Halevi
- Image Type:
- Infrared Image
- Side:
- Recto
- Manuscript:
משהFeb 19 2014, 16:33Amazing! i can read clearly that this is a portion of leviticus. ואשה דרושה מאשה לא יקחו which talks of the cohanim law of avoidin marriage with a divrced woman.
does anyone knows the estimated period of this proto leviticus portion???
IAAMar 2 2014, 9:13משה According to the official publication, this scroll is dated through paleography to around 100 BCE. This date is a little more tentative than the dates given to most Qumran scrolls since the paleo-Hebrew script underwent fewer changes than the more commonly used square script. The main reason for this dating is the similarity of the script of this scroll to the script on contemporary Hasmonean coins.
estebanNov 29 2020, 20:19and why says here herodian period then? Why do not you put the age of the scrolls in exact numbers? It would be better and more clear for us. Please do it. we cant have clear that information with just the description that you use.
Amazing! i can read clearly that this is a portion of leviticus. ואשה דרושה מאשה לא יקחו which talks of the cohanim law of avoidin marriage with a divrced woman.
does anyone knows the estimated period of this proto leviticus portion???
משה According to the official publication, this scroll is dated through paleography to around 100 BCE. This date is a little more tentative than the dates given to most Qumran scrolls since the paleo-Hebrew script underwent fewer changes than the more commonly used square script. The main reason for this dating is the similarity of the script of this scroll to the script on contemporary Hasmonean coins.
and why says here herodian period then? Why do not you put the age of the scrolls in exact numbers? It would be better and more clear for us. Please do it. we cant have clear that information with just the description that you use.